Security Skill
Anti Reversing Techniques
Understand anti-reversing, obfuscation, and protection techniques encountered during software…
$15
Threat Mitigation Mapping
Map identified threats to appropriate security controls and mitigations.
A structured framework for connecting identified threats to the right security controls so your defense investments are deliberate, not guesswork. It maps each threat to preventive, detective and corrective controls across network, application, data, endpoint and process layers, then scores coverage, flags gaps and builds a prioritized remediation roadmap. Turn a list of risks into a defensible, budget-aware security plan.
$15 one-time
Add to a kit → Prices include 20% VAT. · Forged on real agency work · one-time, no lock-in
- Type Skill
- Category Security
- Delivery Email · instant
- License One-time
Inside the run · no black box
See the actual work before you buy it.
A control that exists on paper protects nothing, so unimplemented ones score zero here. From raw threat list to a funded, red-team-tested roadmap, the mapping moves in six steps:
- Load the two inputs: the threat list with STRIDE category, impact, likelihood and risk score, and the control library where every control carries its type (preventive, detective, corrective), layer, effectiveness and cost.
- Map every threat to candidate controls and compute a coverage score from effectiveness times implementation status; a control that exists on paper but is not implemented counts as zero, verified controls count in full.
- Run the two structural checks per threat: defense in depth (active controls in at least 2 different layers, a WAF alone does not cover SQL injection) and control diversity (at least 2 of preventive, detective, corrective, because assume-breach demands detection and recovery, not just prevention).
- Generate the gap list mechanically: coverage under 50 percent, missing layers, missing diversity, with critical-impact threats surfaced first as the immediate work queue.
- Optimize the budget greedily by effectiveness-per-cost ratio and produce a phased roadmap: Phase 1 closes critical threats, Phase 2 the high ones; the first 3 or 4 controls typically deliver 70 to 80 percent of the risk reduction.
- Prove it works instead of assuming: red team bypass tests and blue team detection tests score each control, and anything under 70 percent effectiveness gets marked for rework, existing on paper is not enough.
One power source. 6 lines out.
threat-mitigation-mapping · core
core active · 6 lines
- ✓ prioritizing security in…
Prioritizing security investments under a fixed budget
- ✓ building phased remediat…
Building phased remediation roadmaps
- ✓ validating defense-in-de…
Validating defense-in-depth control coverage
- ✓ reviewing security archi…
Reviewing security architecture for gaps
- ✓ risk treatment and resid…
Risk treatment and residual-risk planning
- ✓ testing control effectiv…
Testing control effectiveness
Yours to keep.
Drag time forward. Watch what stays.
Forever
That's what owning means.
The rented stack
ai writing tool: subscription
expired · access lostanalytics suite: subscription
expired · access lostdesign platform: subscription
expired · access lost(nothing left)
Your forge
-
Spend a limited budget where it cuts the most risk with effectiveness-per-cost ranking
license: perpetual -
Expose blind spots where a threat has no control or only one layer of defense
license: perpetual -
Prove coverage with scored mappings instead of paper controls that may fail
license: perpetual -
Sequence fixes into clear phases that tackle critical threats first
license: perpetual
subscriptions expire · deeds don't
Everything in the box.
Pick a piece up. Watch it work.
Threat-to-control mapping model with coverage scoring
6 parts · one working system · ships instantly by email
This wasn't forged for everyone.
- Not for you if you'd rather rent a tool than own one.
- Not for you if you want someone else to run your stack.
- Not for you if you're happy guessing.
Security architects and risk owners who need to translate threat models into prioritized, cost-aware control plans.
then this was forged for you.Works with
Universal by design: these run in any AI. Delivered in the open Agent Skills + MCP format (native in Claude); ChatGPT, Gemini, Cursor and Copilot adapt the same files their own way.
- Claude Native format
- ChatGPT Adapts via open standards
- Gemini Adapts via open standards
- Cursor Adapts via open standards
- Copilot Adapts via open standards
Catch what's on your mind.
the air is clear. nothing between you and the forge.
catch a spark: the forge will answer
-
Do I need a finished threat model before this is useful?
Yes, it starts from threats you have already identified: its job is the next step, mapping each one to preventive, detective and corrective controls across network, application, data, endpoint and process layers. If you have no threat list yet, do the threat modeling first and bring the output here.
-
How does the budget optimizer decide where money goes?
It ranks candidate controls by effectiveness-to-cost ratio, scores existing coverage per threat, and flags gaps where a threat has no control or only a single layer of defense. The output is a phased roadmap that sequences critical threats first instead of spreading budget evenly.
-
Does it discover new threats or test my systems itself?
No. It is a mapping and planning framework, not a scanner or a pentest, it will not probe your infrastructure or enumerate vulnerabilities. The control-effectiveness harness checks whether your mapped controls hold up, but the threat discovery itself happens upstream.
-
How is it delivered?
By email right after purchase: ready to run, downloaded instantly, no setup wait.
-
One-time or subscription?
A one-time purchase; no subscription or hidden fees. VAT (20%) is included.
-
Can I get a refund?
As a digital product, it can’t be refunded once downloaded. That’s why we show exactly what’s inside and who it’s for, right here.